Menu
FR
search
Publications

Climate: the risk of polarisation – Annual Report 2023

20 September 2023 - Hors série

Click here to see the annual report 2023 :”Climate: the risk of polarisation”

 

Jean Pisani-Ferry, Chair of I4CE

For a long time, I4CE battled against indifference: our analyses and warnings were often sympathetically received by decision-makers, but there were always other more urgent or important issues. After a great deal of persistence to overcome this obstacle, the climate issue is now widely recognised as a major challenge.

 

Yet as it is developing, the climate debate is simultaneously becoming polarised. This is true in the United States, where Paul Krugman recently observed that climate has become an issue in the culture war between Democrats and Republicans. It’s true in Europe, where conservatives have gone on the offensive against the Nature Restoration Act, and the German Finance Minister is railing against Brussels’ green plans. 

 

It’s true in the UK, where Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is tempted to present himself as an advocate for the middle classes and a defender of a way of life put at risk by decarbonisation targets. It is true, of course, in France.

 

It is in this new, more difficult context that we must intervene. Before, we only risked being met with indifference. Now we run the risk of being used as instruments in the political and cultural controversies of others. We’re going to have to be extremely vigilant to prevent these dangers, and very firm in our stance: our only cause is that of climate action, which we want to be swift, impactful and socially just.

 

The forthcoming debates on the French finance bill and, very soon, the campaign for the European elections, will be a test of our mettle. We will approach them well aware of the risks and determined to live up to our responsibilities.

 

Benoit Leguet, Managing Director of I4CE

The debate on the financing of the ecological transition, the backbone of ecological planning, has now been launched in France. The report by Jean Pisani-Ferry and Selma Mahfouz “The economic implications of climate action”, which assesses the need for public funding for this transition, is the first building block. The public authorities will now have to provide answers over the long term, and draw up a financing plan for the transition, specifying what needs to be done, how much public money will be required and how much private money will be needed. The debate has therefore begun, but it is far from over. It goes without saying that I4CE is proud to have contributed to the fundamental aspects of these debates in France, and will continue to be involved. 

 

The same type of debate will have to be held in Europe, when the Parliament and the Commission come up for re-election in 2024, because the European Union will now have to finance its Green Deal. Faced with the Inflation Reduction Act in the United States and China, it cannot be both the best performer in terms of environmental regulations and the worst performer in terms of financing. 

 

In particular, we need to stop treating the financing of the Green Deal in silo with the Stability and Growth Pact and European debt, when we know that the need for private and public money will increase to finance the transition. In 2022, I4CE set up a dedicated team to contribute to these debates, and to ensure that Europe also adopts a plan for financing the transition.

 

Internationally, the same questions arise, and in an even more complex way for developing countries. It is true that they are drawing up long-term strategies to reconcile climate and development, but how will they finance them? They too need a financing plan that enables them to manage their transition, corresponds to their needs, and intelligently combines their national resources and external resources, particularly those provided by international development banks. I4CE works with these banks and helps developing countries to equip themselves with tools for analysing and financially managing their transition. 

 

This annual report details our contributions and our impact on these issues. And on others subjects, always linked to the financing of mitigation and adaptation. As much on France, more about Europe and more international. We are continuing to build on our momentum.

 

Click here to see the annual report 2023 :”Climate: the risk of polarisation”

To learn more
  • 07/02/2024
    Social and Climate Budget Tagging: Insights from Indonesia

    Attention is growing to the need to tackle climate and social issues jointly. Indeed, both climate change and climate policies affect social issues such as poverty, inequality, or access to healthcare. A well-known example is that of carbon pricing, a climate policy which can have regressive effects in some contexts. As another example, climate change induced heatwaves are disproportionately likely to impact poorer individuals who typically have more constrained access to healthcare, physical jobs in outdoor conditions, and through indirectly driving up food prices. To foster an effective and sustainable transition to low-carbon and resilient economies, policymakers need to ensure individuals do not lose more from climate policies than they already lose from the effects of climate change, but instead benefit from them.

  • 07/02/2024
    Approaches to meeting the Paris Agreement goals: options for Public Development Banks

    Options for Public Development Banks. Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015, several public development banks (PDBs) have responded with structured approaches to align their operations with the Agreement’s expectations (as described in Section 1). However, many PDBs, particularly those in emerging markets and developing economies, are yet to adopt an approach to align with the Paris Agreement (i.e., Paris alignment). As entities whose investment mandates are established by the Parties to the Paris Agreement (i.e., national governments), PDBs have specific obligations derived directly from these Parties’ commitments to act across all policy and regulatory frameworks under their jurisdictions, including for state-owned or state-mandated institutions and agencies. Accordingly, PDBs are expected to operate in a manner that supports the achievement of the Paris goals. More specifically, they are obligated to integrate their activities within the Agreement’s implementation mechanism by providing financial, technical, and capacity building support that is entirely consistent with national low-emission climate-resilient development pathways.

  • 07/02/2024
    State of EU progress to climate neutrality

    Assessing the state of progress to inform next steps in policy-making. The European Union (EU) is on its journey to become climate neutral by 2050. This multigenerational project holds many societal, economic, and environmental opportunities. At the same time, it is of unprecedented scale and implies considerable changes to the current systems, which need to be anticipated and addressed for the transition to be fair and acceptable to all. Regular progress checking is the key to understanding where the EU stands on the journey. It allows to identify challenges and opportunities and take targeted policy action guiding investment, supply, consumption, and societal development. There is still no official, comprehensive, and regular EU-wide progress monitoring to achieve this. This second ECNO progress check aims to close the current information gap. It provides a comprehensive view on the state of EU progress towards climate neutrality and identifies key areas of action for the next policy cycle.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer