Very few companies make good use of scenarios to anticipate their climate-constrained future

13 February 2019 - Climate Brief - By : Charlotte VAILLES / Clément METIVIER

Climate change induces disruptions of our ecosystems, and the transition to a low-carbon economy significantly affects the political, economic and social landscapes. Businesses have to adapt to those changes, which entails risks and opportunities. Some changes are already visible today, but the deepest changes are expected to materialize over the mid to long term, and there is a lot of uncertainty around their timing and magnitude. In this context, the use of forward-looking scenarios is particularly useful to evaluate the resilience of a business to climate-related risks, and it is recommended by the Task-Force on Climate-related financial disclosures (TCFD) set up by the Financial Stability Board (FSB).

This Climate Brief gives an overview of the degree of implementation of climate-related scenario analysis to evaluate risks and opportunities, based on the answers of a sample of 2,003 companies to CDP 2017 Climate Change questionnaire. The analysis shows that:

Only 5% of companies indicate using scenario analysis to evaluate their climate-related risks and opportunities;
Half of these companies are based in Europe;
The use of climate-related scenario analysis is much more common among oil and gas companies and energy utilities than in other sectors of activity;
Among companies that disclose carrying out a scenario analysis of their transition risks : about 40% indicate using tailored scenarios, in general internally designed and modelled, and only half explicitly mention using a 2°C or more ambitious scenario;
Among companies that disclose carrying out a scenario analysis of their physical risks : about 25% indicate using external scenarios and tools, in most cases those put together by the IPCC;
Overall, there seems to be confusions in the way climate-related scenarios are understood and used, and a need for guidance on this topic has been identified.

This publication will be followed by additional work on climate-related scenario analysis over the course of 2019, which will be publicly available.

This research is part of the Reimagining Disclosure Project, led by CDP, and supported by Climate-KIC.

Very few companies make good use of scenarios to anticipate their climate-constrained future Download

See appendices

Technical supplement Download

I4CE Contacts

Charlotte VAILLES

Research Fellow – Financing a fair transition Email

Related projects

Re-imagining Disclosure for companies and their 2°C strategy

See all projects

Related publications

Non-Financial Reporting by companies and Scenario Analysis: be cautions with Standardization

See all publications

To learn more

02/19/2026 Blog post
Food sovereignty relies on ecological planning

The upcoming food sovereignty conferences are likely to shape debates on the future of French agriculture in 2026. The main responses provided over the past two years can be summarised as follows: remove production constraints to produce more of everything (both animal and plant products), to recover market shares in France and abroad. Seeking to produce more of everything without considering adaptation or transition is a form of denial, at a time when climate change is hitting farmers hard and regularly, and when our dependence on imported fertilisers and oilseed meals undermines our sovereignty. The conferences must take these considerations into account — otherwise, they will serve only to perpetuate the notion of an illusory sovereignty.
02/19/2026
Which production assets for more resilient and sustainable agricultural and food sectors? Which investment needs? Which stranded assets?

Les choix d’investissements des secteurs agricoles et alimentaires des années à venir sont déterminants. Pour pérenniser leurs productions et faire face aux crises, les secteurs agricoles et alimentaires français doivent évoluer vers des systèmes plus résilients et durables. L’enjeu est d’autant plus crucial que différentes vagues d’investissements sont en cours ou à venir dans ces secteurs. Dans cette étude, I4CE a estimé qu’environ 100 milliards d’euros d’outils de production agricoles et alimentaires sont affectés par la transition. Une coordination et une planification des investissements semblent incontournables, notamment pour en limiter les coûts.
01/23/2026 Foreword of the week
Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives

In a challenging economic and political context, especially for the agriculture sector, some incentive schemes can still help bring stakeholders together in climate transition and resilience initiatives. This is the case with carbon certification schemes, which both ensure the credibility of the climate impact of the actions implemented and provide remuneration for farmers and foresters for changes in practices. Some of these measures, such as replacing mineral fertilisers (mostly imported) with organic fertilisers, also help to meet the sector’s needs for resilience and strategic independence, which are crucial in the current context.

Very few companies make good use of scenarios to anticipate their climate-constrained future

Charlotte VAILLES

Re-imagining Disclosure for companies and their 2°C strategy

Non-Financial Reporting by companies and Scenario Analysis: be cautions with Standardization

Food sovereignty relies on ecological planning

Which production assets for more resilient and sustainable agricultural and food sectors? Which investment needs? Which stranded assets?

Financing carbon farming practices: lessons learnt in France can reinforce the EU level initiatives