Think house, not brick: building an EU Cleantech Investment Plan to match the US Inflation Reduction Act

For years, the European Union assumed it would lead the cleantech race because it was the only one running in it. Mistakenly so. With the Inflation Reduction Act, the US quickly catches up. This brief argues that the best EU policy answer to the IRA is an EU long‑term climate investment plan. As the political appetite for such a plan is currently limited, the European Commission should use the political momentum to propose a targeted investment plan that focuses on the development, scale-up, manufacturing and deployment of clean technologies in the EU. It identifies three first bricks that can already be laid out to build this plan.

 

For years, the European Union assumed it would lead the cleantech race because it was the only one running in it. Mistakenly so. China has demonstrated its capacity to act decisively. Japan, Korea, Canada and India have also entered the race. And with the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the US quickly catches up.

 

The IRA contains a long‑term climate investment plan, providing sizable public funding (400-800 Bn$), with long term predictability (10 years), the simplicity of having a single federal level scheme, and support along the supply chain.

 

The IRA is a wake-up call for the European Union, where no comparable climate investment plan exists yet. To match the IRA, the EU does not need to throw its past decisions overboard. Quite the contrary, it must deliver what it has planned, and more.

 

The EU is well positioned to lead the global cleantech race and seize the opportunities of the green transformation, in a way that benefits global climate action, the EU sovereignty and its economic prosperity. It can build on growing cleantech private investments, an existing pipeline of announced cleantech manufacturing projects, and the political direction set by the European Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan presented in February 2023.

 

This brief argues that, to match the IRA, EU policy makers should think house, not brick. The best EU policy answer is an EU long‑term climate investment plan. As the political appetite for such a plan is currently limited, the European Commission should use the political momentum around the IRA and cleantech, to propose a targeted investment plan that focuses on the development, scale-up, manufacturing and deployment of clean technologies in the EU, from solar panels manufacturing to the offtake of green steel.

 

Such an EU cleantech investment plan should be presented before the summer of 2023, in the context of the mid-term review of the EU Multiannual Financial Framework. Learning from the positive features of the IRA, it should provide public support at scale, through continental-level schemes, in a long term and predictable manner along the supply chain.

 

Three first bricks can already be laid out to build this house:

 

  • Ambitiously finalising and implementing the entire “Fit For 55” legislative package are key for the EU to play to its strengths: predictable and ambitious regulations and carbon pricing.
  • Member States should increase their support for clean technology offtakes, including through green public procurement. NextGenerationEU should be further used to that effect.
  • The European Commission should provide EU‑wide cleantech support schemes that learn from some excellent features of the IRA, such as its predictability and its wide geographical coverage. The planned launch of an EU‑wide tender to support renewable hydrogen production is a positive step, and should be used as a pilot to develop similar schemes for key clean technologies.

 

With the approaching EU elections of May 2024 and the end of NextGenerationEU in sight, such cleantech investment plan could lead the EU to advance towards an even more ambitious discussion: an EU long‑term Climate Investment Plan. This would include and go beyond cleantech, to ensure EU, national and private investments turn all the Green Deal objectives into tangible realities for businesses, workers and families.

To learn more
  • 07/02/2024
    State of EU progress to climate neutrality

    Assessing the state of progress to inform next steps in policy-making. The European Union (EU) is on its journey to become climate neutral by 2050. This multigenerational project holds many societal, economic, and environmental opportunities. At the same time, it is of unprecedented scale and implies considerable changes to the current systems, which need to be anticipated and addressed for the transition to be fair and acceptable to all. Regular progress checking is the key to understanding where the EU stands on the journey. It allows to identify challenges and opportunities and take targeted policy action guiding investment, supply, consumption, and societal development. There is still no official, comprehensive, and regular EU-wide progress monitoring to achieve this. This second ECNO progress check aims to close the current information gap. It provides a comprehensive view on the state of EU progress towards climate neutrality and identifies key areas of action for the next policy cycle.

  • 06/28/2024
    From Stranded Assets to Assets-at-Risk: Reframing the narrative for European private financial institutions

    Private financial institutions must rethink their approach to managing stranded asset risks. The current narrative on quantifying fossil fuel sector exposures within a limited scope of financial portfolios (mostly loans) largely underestimates potential stranding losses. As the low-carbon transition impacts all economic sectors, private financial institutions (FIs) must consider material transition-driven stranding risks within their overall transition risk management framework using a ‘whole of economy’ lens. Traditional risk management approaches are ill-suited to the methodological and quantification challenges of transition-driven stranding risks, so a flexible, dynamic, forward-looking approach is necessary. Strong, incentivising public policy coordinated with financial regulatory and supervisory impetus is necessary to preemptively identify, monitor and manage stranding losses on ‘assets-at-risk’ (i.e., potential stranded assets). The ECB finds that 40% of the total loan portfolio of euro area banks is exposed to energy-intensive sectors*, making them vulnerable to transition risks, including stranding. It is time for an urgent reframing of the stranded asset narrative to avoid significant financial losses (endangering financial stability) and direct orderly transition finance flows to retire or transform assets-at-risk before they become fully stranded.

  • 06/07/2024 Foreword of the week
    EU election time: climate policy and finance challenges under scrutiny

    This weekend, citizens across the EU head to the polls. Many expect a swing to the right, in stark contrast to the “green wave” of 2019. In Brussels, leaders are looking ahead to a five-year mandate dominated by questions of security and competitiveness.  In these turbulent times, what is the future of Europe’s flagship climate package, the Green Deal? The Green Deal and the Fit for 55 package gave us the regulatory framework – but implementation requires investment. I4CE’s flagship EU Climate Investment Deficit report shows that climate spending must double to make the 2030 target achievable.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer