Publications

How could financial actors manage their exposure to climate risks?

4 May 2017 - Climate Brief - By : Morgane NICOL / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

Financial actors should integrate a forward-looking climate assessment into their procedures and models

In order to manage climate-related issues in their portfolios, financial actors will need in the long run to incorporate a forward-looking analysis for alignment of their portfolios with a 2°C pathway into their risk management and investment decision-making processes. Such analysis would need to be based on scenarios that represent different pathways for decarbonisation of the economy, and more specifically a 2°C pathway, broken down into quantitative variables of financial impact of the risks and opportunity for low-carbon transition.

A number of constraints currently limit their ability to conduct such an assessment

However, certain constraints currently restrict the possibility for financial institutions to carry out such analysis for all of their outstanding investment and financing amounts: the lack of forward-looking information on companies and other counterparties; certain current features of financial models; the lack of breakdown of climate-related scenarios into financial impact variables; the information systems of financial players which need to be adapted; and the lack of training on climate-related issues for their personnel.

However, financial actors should begin today to implement initial actions

Nonetheless, financial players can start as of today to progressively roll out a certain number of preliminary actions:

  • Encouraging their counterparties to issue forward-looking information on their own alignment with a 2°C pathway, for example by following initial TCFD guidelines;
  • Adopting an internal stance on scenarios on which analyses are to be based, in particular “2°C” scenarios, and thinking about the objectives to be set for each business sector;
  • Adapting information systems so as to be able to collect, store and aggregate new indicators and information on the climate-related issues of counterparties;
  • Adapting the financial models used;
  • Training all employees on the impacts of climate-related issues for the financial sector;
  • Collecting and analysing the climate-related indicators already available, as detailed in Climate Brief no. 46;
  • Putting in place a governance system that will encourage climate-related issues to be taken into consideration by each internal business division.
How could financial actors manage their exposure to climate risks? Download
To learn more
  • 03/28/2025 Hors série
    The pathway for climate investments in turbulent times – annual report 2024

    We are witnessing a withdrawal of commitments to climate action. In the US, President Donald Trump does not hide his hostility to what he calls the ‘climate hoax’. In Europe and in France, new narratives around competitiveness, strategic autonomy and security are gaining ground, reflecting a new political reality. If there is still a broad consensus on the long-term objective of climate neutrality, how to get there is increasingly challenged, generating uncertainty. The scarcity of fiscal resources impacts the willingness to embark on the green transition.

  • 03/24/2025
    TRAMe2035 Scenario for a transition of households dietary habits by 2035

    Current food production and consumption trends contribute to a range of public health, social and environmental problems. The need for a transition is no longer in doubt: we must move towards a system that produces healthy food with a low impact on ecosystems, is accessible to all, and ensures fair remuneration for producers. There’s no denying that the questions we raise here are politically and socially sensitive, as food is deeply connected to cultural, economic, environmental and health issues. Nevertheless, it is essential to develop ways to foster open discussion. IDDRI and I4CE have therefore joined forces with several other actors to provide insights for the debate.

  • 03/21/2025 Blog post
    In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential 

    On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer