Interactions between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and complementary energy policies by 2030 (only in Spanish)

30 November 2015 - Special issues - By : Sylvain CAIL / Andrea BLANCO TORO

I4CE– Institute for Climate Economics and Enerdata have contributed to the Spanish Energy Journal issue 46/November 2015 by presenting their analysis on the EU ETS developement by 2030. This paper presents results from the analysis of interactions between the EU ETS and energy-climate complementary policies.

The paper desmontrates that:

  • The combination of different objectives RES, EE and CO2 will have some impact on the cost of transition to a low carbon economy. Indeed, the unique GHG emissions reduction target may be sufficient to reach a 27% share of renewable energy sources in gross final consumption, but attaining the target for energy efficiency would require a large-scale implementation of costly energy saving policies. The costs of energy efficiency policies may be profoundly affected (by a factor 4) by the coexistence of targets.
  • Interactions between different policies may induce overhead vis-à-vis an economically optimal trajectory transition towards a low carbon economy. However, complementary instruments are necessary because of a wide array of barriers to entry hampering to exploit the full decarbonization potential at lower cost in the short and long term. A whole policy mix is necessary, but its impact on the carbon price should be carefully assessed and justified in a transparent and comprehensive manner.
  • The emissions cap in the EU ETS should be set taking into account these instruments. These latter are however likely to under or over achieve their objectives, and some flexibility is necessary in the supply of allowances to improve the resilience of the EU ETS.
Interactions between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and complementary energy policies by 2030 (only in Spanish) Download
To learn more
  • 07/02/2024
    Social and Climate Budget Tagging: Insights from Indonesia

    Attention is growing to the need to tackle climate and social issues jointly. Indeed, both climate change and climate policies affect social issues such as poverty, inequality, or access to healthcare. A well-known example is that of carbon pricing, a climate policy which can have regressive effects in some contexts. As another example, climate change induced heatwaves are disproportionately likely to impact poorer individuals who typically have more constrained access to healthcare, physical jobs in outdoor conditions, and through indirectly driving up food prices. To foster an effective and sustainable transition to low-carbon and resilient economies, policymakers need to ensure individuals do not lose more from climate policies than they already lose from the effects of climate change, but instead benefit from them.

  • 06/13/2024 Blog post Foreword of the week
    After Bonn and towards COP 29: the battle on finance and the role of financing plans for the transition

    Tense climate negotiations just ended in Bonn with limited progress on finance and the revised climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. During the opening ceremony of the sixtieth sessions of the subsidiary bodies (SB 60) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Simon Stiell –Executive Secretary– highlighted the need to “make serious progress on finance, the great enabler of climate action” and to aim for bolder, broader and inclusive third generation Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs 3.0) that “can serve as blueprints to propel economies and societies forward and drive more resilience”.

  • 05/17/2024 Foreword of the week
    Carbon pricing revenues: their role in financing the climate transition

    Last month, the Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC, Simon Stiell, stressed how important this and next year are for the achievement of the Paris Agreement and called for “a quantum leap in climate finance” ahead of the Spring Meetings of the World Bank Group and International Monetary Fund. Indeed, with emissions required to peak before 2025, our window of opportunity is rapidly closing to keep 1.5°C within reach. More and better finance is urgently needed. Carbon pricing policies and their revenues are part of the tools available that can help fill the climate finance gap.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer