Publications

Fossil fuel subsidy reforms: state of play and ways forward

BACKGROUND:

Fossil fuel subsidies are incompatible with the low carbon energy transition

 

SUMMARY:

Promoting the production and consumption of fossil fuels through subsidies is incompatible with the Paris Agreement on climate change.

While G20 countries have committed to phase out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption” since 2009, the progress towards reform has been mixed. The G20 countries still provide about USD 70 billion in production fossil fuel subsidies, while the total global consumption subsidies are estimated to be in the range of USD 320 billion to USD 5 trillion per year.

Recent examples demonstrate that subsidy reforms, combined with compensation mechanisms, are feasible. While there is no silver bullet to tackle the fossil fuel subsidy issue – and some of them are actually necessary –, the next steps towards a sounder and more efficient approach to fossil fuel subsidies may include:

 

  • Establish clear action roadmaps for the reform of fossil fuel subsidies;
  • Work within existing platforms such as the WTO to refine existing definitions in the specific case of fossil fuel subsidies;
  • Reinforce existing peer-review processes and extend them through international cooperation platforms such as the UNFCCC;
  • Use transparency frameworks to improve the national and international reporting on fossil fuel subsidies and their reform;
  • Reinforce international initiatives that allow for transnational research, such as the Global Subsidy Initiative and the OECD/IEA works, and efforts such as the World Bank’s of IMF’s that foster capacity building on these issues.
Fossil fuel subsidy reforms: state of play and ways forward Download
I4CE Contacts
Dr. Sébastien POSTIC
Dr. Sébastien POSTIC
Chercheur – Finances publiques, Développement Email
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Sébastien POSTIC, Phd
Research Fellow – Public finance, Development Email
To learn more
  • 03/28/2025 Hors série
    The pathway for climate investments in turbulent times – annual report 2024

    We are witnessing a withdrawal of commitments to climate action. In the US, President Donald Trump does not hide his hostility to what he calls the ‘climate hoax’. In Europe and in France, new narratives around competitiveness, strategic autonomy and security are gaining ground, reflecting a new political reality. If there is still a broad consensus on the long-term objective of climate neutrality, how to get there is increasingly challenged, generating uncertainty. The scarcity of fiscal resources impacts the willingness to embark on the green transition.

  • 03/24/2025
    TRAMe2035 Scenario for a transition of households dietary habits by 2035

    Current food production and consumption trends contribute to a range of public health, social and environmental problems. The need for a transition is no longer in doubt: we must move towards a system that produces healthy food with a low impact on ecosystems, is accessible to all, and ensures fair remuneration for producers. There’s no denying that the questions we raise here are politically and socially sensitive, as food is deeply connected to cultural, economic, environmental and health issues. Nevertheless, it is essential to develop ways to foster open discussion. IDDRI and I4CE have therefore joined forces with several other actors to provide insights for the debate.

  • 03/21/2025 Blog post
    In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential 

    On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer