Menu
FR
search
Publications

How should financial actors deal with climate-related issues in their portfolios today?

4 May 2017 - Climate Brief - By : Morgane NICOL / Ian COCHRAN, Phd

Financial institutions face climate-related issues

Certain constraints, differentiated according to business lines, currently limit the ability of financial institutions to carry out on their portfolios a quantified forward-looking analysis based on scenarios. Nonetheless, these institutions as of today should – and can – begin to put in place the basis for management and reporting strategies to support alignment with a 2°C pathway. Various organisations – such as NGOs, extra-financial rating agencies, consulting firms and specialised service providers – are developing ‘Climate’ indicators, intended to enable financial actors to assess and address climate-related transition issues. Using one type or combination of such indicators is an initial step that will facilitate the integration into their processes of quantitative indicators of impact of the low-carbon transition on financial performance.

“Climate” indicators can be grouped into five main categories: carbon footprint indicators; “ESG” type qualitative indicators; “green share / brown share” indicators; “physical” carbon footprint indicators; and indicators of alignment with a low-carbon or 2°C pathway. Each type of indicator presents advantages and drawbacks and their relevance depends on the business lines and on the specific objectives of the financial institution.

Climate Brief 46 presents the most promising avenues of analysis for different financial business lines depending on their specificities. Broadly speaking, financial players should begin as of now to analyse their climate-related issues in a forward-looking manner based on semi-quantitative indicators.

Two types of currently available indicators seem particularly relevant

  • indicators of alignment with a 2°C pathway: these macro-indicators aggregate both quantitative indicators based on historical data when available, and qualitative forward-looking indicators. On one hand, they can measure, for example the current exposure to the introduction of a carbon price. On the other hand, they can give a forward-looking analysis of a company’s ‘resilience’ in a low-carbon economy given its ability to adapt itself to a regulatory and market environment in transition;
  • indicators of “green shares” and “brown shares”: these indicators inform financial actors of a company’s current distribution of revenues between “green” activities that will be favoured and “brown” activities that will be penalised by the low-carbon transition. These indicators, once aggregated in terms of outstanding amounts, enable a financial institution to measure its exposure to companies that are heavily exposed to transition risks – as well as those that stand to benefit from the transition. These indicators, however do not alone make it possible to measure the extent of the potential losses or gains, but may be progressively refined into shades of “green” and “brown”.
How should financial actors deal with climate-related issues in their portfolios today? Download
Related projects See all projects
To learn more
  • 03/28/2025 Hors série
    The pathway for climate investments in turbulent times – annual report 2024

    We are witnessing a withdrawal of commitments to climate action. In the US, President Donald Trump does not hide his hostility to what he calls the ‘climate hoax’. In Europe and in France, new narratives around competitiveness, strategic autonomy and security are gaining ground, reflecting a new political reality. If there is still a broad consensus on the long-term objective of climate neutrality, how to get there is increasingly challenged, generating uncertainty. The scarcity of fiscal resources impacts the willingness to embark on the green transition.

  • 03/24/2025
    TRAMe2035 Scenario for a transition of households dietary habits by 2035

    Current food production and consumption trends contribute to a range of public health, social and environmental problems. The need for a transition is no longer in doubt: we must move towards a system that produces healthy food with a low impact on ecosystems, is accessible to all, and ensures fair remuneration for producers. There’s no denying that the questions we raise here are politically and socially sensitive, as food is deeply connected to cultural, economic, environmental and health issues. Nevertheless, it is essential to develop ways to foster open discussion. IDDRI and I4CE have therefore joined forces with several other actors to provide insights for the debate.

  • 03/21/2025 Blog post
    In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential 

    On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer