Menu
FR
search
Publications Financial regulation Europe

Climate stress tests: The integration of transition risk drivers at a sectoral level

16 July 2021 - Climate Report - By : Clara CALIPEL / Anuschka HILKE / Charlotte VAILLES

Since 2018, and under the initiative of the NGFS, the network of central banks and supervisors for greening the financial system, several central banks and supervisors have begun to conduct their first climate stress test exercises to determine the vulnerability of financial institutions to climate-related risks. In order to help central banks to carry out this type of exercise, the NGFS published in 2020, its first guide to climate scenarios analysis that can be used in climate stress tests. 

 

In its report, I4CE attempts to provide new reflexions to the analysis of climate scenarios that can be used in climate stress tests, by providing a more detailed sectoral approach than that the one proposed by the NGFS. In particular, this study demonstrates the importance of an intra-sectoral analysis in order to identify the risks drivers specific to each sector and the vulnerability indicators specific to each actor of the sector.

 

The report is based on two sectoral case studies, one focusing on the private residential property sector and the other on the cement industry in France.

 

 

There are many transition risk drivers, which differ according to the sector and can overlap

For the two case studies, a detailed analysis of these two sectors and of their specific transition issues has identified several transition risk drivers for each sector.

 

In each case, the analysis of these risk drivers has demonstrated the plausibility of their overlapping. If they emerge simultaneously, the effects of these risk drivers could be multiplied, thereby increasing the final risks.

 

Click on this button to see the image

 

 

Not all actors within a given sector have the same capacity to deal with transition risks

The report also shows that an intra-sectoral analysis is essential to assess the difference in vulnerability of the economic actors (households and companies) to the different risk drivers.

 

The analysis of the vulnerability indicators is also necessary to determine the extent to which the overlapping of these risk drivers could multiply the impacts, since the number of counterparties potentially concerned increases.

 

A quantification of the different sectoral risk drivers through the vulnerability indicators would be a next step. It would help to determine the orders of magnitude for each risk driver, and thus demonstrate the relevance of assessing risk drivers at intra-sectoral levels.

 

 

 

In addition to stress tests, analyses of risk drivers would improve other risk management tools

The research could also potentially provide valuable insights to improve the transition risk management tools used by financial institutions, thanks to in-depth understandings of transition risks at the sub-sectoral levels.

 

 

Finance ClimAct project

 

This study is part of the Finance ClimAct project and was carried out with the contribution of the European Union LIFE program. This Work reflects only the views of I4CE. Other members of the Finance ClimAct Consortium, as well as the European Commission, are not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

 

   

With the contribution of the European Union LIFE program

 

What is a climate stress test? Why is the sectoral view important in such an exercise? Clara Calipel answers these questions and summarizes in 2 minutes the main results of her study on the integration of risk factors at the sectoral level : 

 

 

Climate stress tests: The integration of transition risk drivers at a sectoral level Download
I4CE Contacts
Clara CALIPEL
Clara CALIPEL
 Research Fellow – EU Climate Investments  Email
Charlotte VAILLES
Charlotte VAILLES
 Research Fellow – Financing a fair transition Email
Related projects See all projects
To learn more
  • 10/25/2024 Blog post
    Reframing the stranded assets narrative for European private financial institutions

    The implementation of the new banking package (or Capital Requirements Directive package) that adopts the final parts of the international Basel 3 financial regulation is underway in the European Union. The European Banking Authority (EBA) along with the other European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) is mandated to develop technical standards that provide the framework to help financial institutions comply with the new regulatory rules. Key among these standards is the novel guidance on ESG risks which is expected to be finalised by the EBA in the coming months. This is an opportune moment to address weaknesses in banks’ risk management practices, particularly regarding the underestimation of stranded asset risks, a missing angle in current policy debates.  

  • 07/05/2024 Foreword of the week
    After 5 years of the Green Deal, where is Europe on the road to decarbonisation?

    Following the European elections on June 9, the EU is adapting to a new, more conservative, political reality. Yet despite changing political tides, a new EU leadership will still need to find a credible answer to how the continent is to reach climate neutrality by 2050. To understand how to get there, we need a clear understanding of the progress already made. This is where the European Climate Neutrality Observatory (ECNO) comes in.

  • 06/28/2024
    From Stranded Assets to Assets-at-Risk: Reframing the narrative for European private financial institutions

    Private financial institutions must rethink their approach to managing stranded asset risks. The current narrative on quantifying fossil fuel sector exposures within a limited scope of financial portfolios (mostly loans) largely underestimates potential stranding losses. As the low-carbon transition impacts all economic sectors, private financial institutions (FIs) must consider material transition-driven stranding risks within their overall transition risk management framework using a ‘whole of economy’ lens. Traditional risk management approaches are ill-suited to the methodological and quantification challenges of transition-driven stranding risks, so a flexible, dynamic, forward-looking approach is necessary. Strong, incentivising public policy coordinated with financial regulatory and supervisory impetus is necessary to preemptively identify, monitor and manage stranding losses on ‘assets-at-risk’ (i.e., potential stranded assets). The ECB finds that 40% of the total loan portfolio of euro area banks is exposed to energy-intensive sectors*, making them vulnerable to transition risks, including stranding. It is time for an urgent reframing of the stranded asset narrative to avoid significant financial losses (endangering financial stability) and direct orderly transition finance flows to retire or transform assets-at-risk before they become fully stranded.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer