CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

28 December 2011 - Climate Report - By : Claudine FOUCHEROT

By Claudine FOUCHEROT et Valentin BELLASSEN

The agricultural sector accounts for 14% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. If we also take into account carbon emissions and sequestration from upstream – production of fertilisers, deforestation, etc. – and downstream – bio-energies, etc. – the share rises to 30%. Many practices and technologies enable agriculture’s impact on climate change to be reduced. According to a number of estimates that are summarised in this research, the agricultural sector’s mitigation potential is of the same order of magnitude as its emissions over a period of 30 years. However, changing agricultural practices comes at a cost, and in most cases such changes are not made without economic incentives.

Carbon offsetting projects are one of the economic tools available to reduce agricultural emissions by paying for metric tons of avoided CO2e emissions. A summary of the emission reductions enabled by agricultural projects to date is provided in this report. It covers most projects certified by quality assurance standards, including those set up by the Kyoto Protocol (Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation) and those in the voluntary market (Verified Carbon Standard, Climate Action Reserve, Gold Standard, Chicago Climate Exchange, and American Carbon Registry). The assessment drawn up on this basis shows that emission reductions enabled through carbon offsetting are thousand times lower than actual emissions and their potential mitigation. Agricultural projects have reduced emissions by 14 MtCO2e in 2010, i.e. 7% of the reductions generated by all carbon offset projects across all sectors for this year.

Initiatives focus on three technologies: bio-energies (crop residues), methanisation of livestock waste, and soil carbon sequestration using no-till practices. This is very little compared with the large number of mitigation technologies that could be used in this sector. The diffuse nature of agricultural emissions and the cost of the abatement measures are the main obstacles to developing agricultural projects. However, the introduction of multi-farm aggregators enables to share costs. Moreover, research on new techniques for measuring emissions more efficiently and less costly is a mean to overcome these obstacles and release the mitigation potential.

CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR Download

To learn more

03/28/2025 Hors série
The pathway for climate investments in turbulent times – annual report 2024

We are witnessing a withdrawal of commitments to climate action. In the US, President Donald Trump does not hide his hostility to what he calls the ‘climate hoax’. In Europe and in France, new narratives around competitiveness, strategic autonomy and security are gaining ground, reflecting a new political reality. If there is still a broad consensus on the long-term objective of climate neutrality, how to get there is increasingly challenged, generating uncertainty. The scarcity of fiscal resources impacts the willingness to embark on the green transition.
03/24/2025
TRAMe2035 Scenario for a transition of households dietary habits by 2035

Current food production and consumption trends contribute to a range of public health, social and environmental problems. The need for a transition is no longer in doubt: we must move towards a system that produces healthy food with a low impact on ecosystems, is accessible to all, and ensures fair remuneration for producers. There’s no denying that the questions we raise here are politically and socially sensitive, as food is deeply connected to cultural, economic, environmental and health issues. Nevertheless, it is essential to develop ways to foster open discussion. IDDRI and I4CE have therefore joined forces with several other actors to provide insights for the debate.
03/21/2025 Blog post
In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential

On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax.

CARBON OFFSET PROJECTS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR

The pathway for climate investments in turbulent times – annual report 2024

TRAMe2035 Scenario for a transition of households dietary habits by 2035

In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential