Publications

Climate Report n° 50 « Mitigating climate change and waste recycling: household packaging case study »

14 June 2015 - By : Vivian DEPOUES, PhD

• The waste sector has consistently poor visibility when it comes to GHG  inventories. Its true impact can only be understood through a comprehensive life-cycle assessment methodology. It is only then that the actual effectiveness of waste prevention and recycling in mitigating GHG  emissions becomes clear.

• This Climate Report examines the principle of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) through the example of household packaging in France. 3.2 Mt of packaging is recycled every year, resulting in a 2.1 Mt reduction in GHG emissions. This outcome is achieved through the involvement of all stakeholders. Reductions in waste treatment and the reuse of recycled materials are the principle sources of this reduction. Reusing recycled materials has even become a competitive option in a market based on the original EPR economic model, primarily financed by producers. The positive climate impact is a co-benefit of the recycling target, which relies both on sorting by consumers and the household waste management organization of local authorities

• The report details the connections between the model’s financial incentives and measures to reduce emissions at each stage. It stresses that the potential for mitigation associated with processing household packaging could be intensified as part of a transition to a circular economy. Success depends on improved policy coordination—especially at local level—and heightened visibility of co-benefits with regard to climate issues.

Climate Report n° 50 « Mitigating climate change and waste recycling: household packaging case study » Download
I4CE Contacts
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Vivian DEPOUES, PhD
Research Lead – Adaptation to climate change Email
To learn more
  • 03/24/2025
    TRAMe2035 Scenario for a transition of households dietary habits by 2035

    Current food production and consumption trends contribute to a range of public health, social and environmental problems. The need for a transition is no longer in doubt: we must move towards a system that produces healthy food with a low impact on ecosystems, is accessible to all, and ensures fair remuneration for producers. There’s no denying that the questions we raise here are politically and socially sensitive, as food is deeply connected to cultural, economic, environmental and health issues. Nevertheless, it is essential to develop ways to foster open discussion. IDDRI and I4CE have therefore joined forces with several other actors to provide insights for the debate.

  • 03/21/2025 Blog post
    In the absence of a carbon tax in Canada, measures to fill the gap are essential 

    On his first day in office, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the elimination of the consumer carbon tax, in response to political pressures rather than evidence-based concerns about its effectiveness or impact on affordability. The tax had played a crucial role in reducing the country’s GHG emissions, and along with other carbon pricing policies, was expected to contribute nearly half of Canada’s emissions reductions by 2030. Additionally, the majority of revenues collected were redistributed to citizens, protecting vulnerable households. Thus, without alternative policies to compensate, eliminating the tax could slow emissions reductions and increase inflationary pressure, particularly for low- and middle-income families who benefited financially from the Canada Carbon Rebate funded by the tax. 

  • 03/21/2025 Foreword of the week
    Adaptation finance in the EU: what role for insurers and other private financial institutions?

    The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has committed to presenting a European Climate Adaptation Plan in 2026. The European Commission has previously emphasised public budgets as the main source of coverage for climate-related disasters. But if both the EU’s and member states’ budgets are strained by competing investment priorities and high debt levels in some cases, what are the complementary avenues for financing adaptation in the EU? How can private financial actors, such as banks, insurance companies or asset management firms, support adaptation efforts, not only to ensure resilience (i.e. recovery) from climate disasters, but also to prevent impacts before they arrive?

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer