Green industry: the game is kicking off

12 May 2023 - Foreword of the week - By : Solène METAYER

Faced with international competition exacerbated by the US Inflation Reduction Act, Team Europe (and longtime team member, France) is preparing its response. The team’s tactics tackle two challenges: greening existing industrial sectors such as steel or cement, and industrialising the production of green goods, particularly those cleantechs that will make the transition a reality, such as heat pumps or electrolysers. To meet the first challenge, the French government has put 5 to 10 billion euros of public money on the table to decarbonise the most polluting production sites, in return for private investment. But has the extent of the industrial investment needs been properly assessed?

 

In a study we are publishing today, available in this newsletter, we have analysed the investment needs of four heavy-industry sector in France. The study shows that investment needs vary by a factor of 4 depending on the decarbonisation scenarios selected! For example, a scenario with a very energy-sufficient and material-efficient economy requires less steel or cement, and therefore less decarbonisation investment. This highlights the importance of anticipating, planning, of agreeing on tomorrow’s needs, to avoid both risks of over-investment and under-investment.

 

To meet the second challenge, industrialising cleantech, France, with its green industry bill, and the European Commission, with its Net Zero Industry Act, want to speed up the granting of permits for the installation of new sites. This is essential. However, the French legislation is not focused on cleantech and thus fails to give it a comparative advantage. As for the European Union and its member states, they must invest in their institutional capacities to speed-up the permitting processes without cutting back on environmental safeguards. This is one of the proposals in our new blog post on the Net Zero Industry Act, which outlines how to make it a launch pad for a European Investment Plan for cleantech and climate. Greening industry and industrializing the green sector – two distinct challenges that need to be tackled simultaneously, with French and European policies working in harmony. It’s teamwork that wins matches.

 

Read the newsletter

 

To learn more
  • 02/24/2026 Op-ed
    EU Member States set 2040 climate target – but is the Union on track for 2030 in the energy sector?

    An outlook on EU investment needs for the energy transition and the EU’s 2040 climate target. Just before the start of COP30 in Belém, EU Member States agreed to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by 90% in 2040 compared to 1990 levels, including a 5% flexibility through international carbon credits. 

  • 01/21/2026 Blog post
    On Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming the devil is in…the demand

    The implementation of carbon farming practices on European farms and in European forests is a lever for achieving carbon neutrality, but also for farm resilience, the adaptation of forest stands to climate change and for contributing to our strategic independence. Certifying and financing low-carbon practices is the objective of the CRCF (Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming) regulation, which will come into effect in 2026. Now seems the right time to draw lessons from six years of experience with a similar standard in France: the “Label Bas-Carbone” (Low Carbon Label – LBC). The results show that striking a balance between scientific rigour and accessibility for stakeholders has led to the development of a substantial range of projects. However, the real challenge is to build sufficient and appropriate demand to finance the projects. There is no miracle solution, but complementary financing channels may emerge. 

  • 12/12/2025 Blog post Foreword of the week
    Paris +10: France and Europe must step up on climate – to protect our security, sovereignty, competitiveness, and public finances

    How distant December 12, 2015 now seems. All delegations at COP21 had then rallied behind Laurent Fabius’s little green hammer. Ten years later, the trend is closer to backlash. Climate action is now often portrayed in the public debate as too costly, because it requires major investment. Ineffective, since our share of global emissions is small. Unfair, because it cuts into purchasing power. Too divisive, supported only by part of the electorate. Too late, since keeping the planet below +2°C of warming now seems out of reach. Arguments that are partly true—yet require substantial nuance. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer