Improved forest management practices integration into carbon certification schemes: where are we and how to move forward?

20 September 2024 - Climate Report - By : Julia GRIMAULT / Simon MARTEL / Ilié STORMS / Valentin BELLASSEN

Improved forest management (IFM) can help mitigate climate change by increasing carbon sequestration in forests and wood products while ensuring the highest possible sustainable level of forest carbon stocks, taking into account natural disturbances. In Europe, these practices could be encouraged, especially to counterbalance the decline in forest sinks in some countries. There is an opportunity to incentivize these practices under the European Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF) regulation. Forest features and improved forest management strategies need to be properly integrated within this new scheme. This is where INFORMA comes in! 

 

Our analysis of 15 IFM methodologies identifies four main challenges linked to IFM project certification:

 

1. Diversification of management practices under carbon certification

Improving forest management can mean many different things, but most international methodologies focus on reduced harvesting. We need to develop additional methodologies that encompass a wider range of practices, backed by science, to demonstrate carbon impact and risk reduction.

 

2. Baselines: the main risk of carbon certification projects

The primary risk linked to carbon certification standards lies in the establishment of the baseline, which can lead to over-crediting.

We recommend:

  • Limiting the choices available to project developers for defining their baseline, in order to reduce information asymmetry and bias.
  • Exploring the use of dynamic baselines.
  • Choosing baselines that are close to initial carbon stocks.
  • Measuring and verifying carbon stock increments.

 

3. Carbon certification tools need to better integrate the future impact of climate change to ensure carbon permanence

The future impact of climate change on forests is likely underestimated in current non-permanence management tools. Larger buffer pool deductions, along with regular updates to protocols based on the latest science, would help address this issue. Methodologies that reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires and increase long-term resilience should also be considered.

 

4. Increase visibility and robustness of sustainability criteria

In practice, there is significant heterogeneity between IFM methodologies in how they integrate sustainability impacts. Each methodology sets its own rules, leading to a lack of clarity for project financiers. Guidelines for integrating and measuring sustainability issues should be developed to ensure greater consistency between methodologies and greater transparency for projects. 

 

Improved forest management practices integration into carbon certification schemes: where are we and how to move forward? Download
I4CE Contacts
Julia GRIMAULT
Julia GRIMAULT
Team Lead – Forest-based sector, Carbon certification Email
Simon MARTEL
Simon MARTEL
Research Fellow – Carbon certification, forest, and carbon farming Email
Related projects See all projects
To learn more
  • 09/05/2024
    Developing long-life wood uses to improve carbon storage: where are we in Europe? Key takeaways

    Directing more wood towards long-life products such as panels and insulation materials can help us maximise carbon sinks without increasing forest harvests. That’s because these products store carbon for a longer periods of time in form of long-lasting construction and renovation materials. But for this to happen in practice, more market opportunities and production capacity are needed. How can public policies help?

  • 03/15/2024 Foreword of the week
    Certification framework: the devil is in the details

    A few days after the conclusion of negotiations on the European Union’s carbon removals certification Framework (CRCF), I4CE helped organise the European Carbon Farming Summit in Valencia, as part of the CREDIBLE project. The high level of stakeholder participation at the summit testifies to the expectations that this new tool will contribute to a better economic valuation of carbon farming practices. The summit raised high hopes for improving and harmonising carbon measurement to certify projects, in particular through remote sensing, in a sector where there is a great deal of uncertainty. While it is vital to improve measurement and monitoring, uncertainty must not be allowed to justify inaction, and the key is to find the right balance between cost and accuracy.

  • 10/30/2023 Foreword of the week
    Wood industry: What are European countries doing?

    Year after year, France becomes aware of the drastic deterioration in the carbon sink of its forests. Tree mortality increases sharply with droughts and health crises. Yet France needs this carbon sink to achieve its climate objectives and needs to preserve it by improving the resilience of its forests, but also – and this is less obvious – by making the best possible use of the harvested wood from the forests. France’s climate strategy is counting heavily on maximising the carbon sink in wood products, i.e. making greater use of the wood harvested to manufacture long-lasting products, particularly in the construction industry. Some products store carbon over the long term, and are not only those that we imagine at first glance, as we showed in a previous study. 

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer