World Bank’s reform: almost a new pilot onboard

3 March 2023 - Foreword of the week - By : Claire ESCHALIER

After the sudden resignation of David Malpass, the World Bank’s Trump-appointed President, mid-February, Washington surprised the world again last Thursday, with the nomination of Ajay Banga, long-time Mastercard CEO, as his potential successor. Not only was the timing very rapid, but the controversial profile of the nominee also generated some sense of puzzlement. His limited experience both in public development projects and in contributing to tackling climate change has fuelled a large part of the scepticism. Reassuring however, is his understanding of the private sector in both the global North and global South.

 

With a CV such as Banga’s, mobilising more private finance to complement public funding (which is a major objective of the ongoing reform of the World Bank) should be a piece of cake. But again, this will only solve part of the problems: public resources are scarce and can’t always be substituted by private funding. With the appropriate conditions in place, any windmill or solar powerplant should find private sponsors. But no matter how hard we try, it is unlikely that we will get the private sector to fund the deep regulatory and institutional energy sector reform that is needed in many countries to guide the transition.

 

What does this imply for the reform? Of course, significant efforts should be dedicated to finding the One trillion per year estimated funding needs for a transition in developing countries other than China. But as much attention should be given to reshaping the way public development banks operate so that the impact of every public euro spent is carefully maximised. When reforming the World Bank and the broader financial architecture, all types of activities should thus be reconsidered to answer the countries’ investment needs for the transition. In their latest report, Alice Pauthier and Aki Kachi (NewClimate Institute) share some insight on how international public financial institutions can take this direction and progressively move from a project to a counterparty and system-level approach, and align financial systems in developing countries with global climate goals.

 

Read the newsletter

To learn more
  • 07/02/2024
    Approaches to meeting the Paris Agreement goals: options for Public Development Banks

    Options for Public Development Banks. Since the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015, several public development banks (PDBs) have responded with structured approaches to align their operations with the Agreement’s expectations (as described in Section 1). However, many PDBs, particularly those in emerging markets and developing economies, are yet to adopt an approach to align with the Paris Agreement (i.e., Paris alignment). As entities whose investment mandates are established by the Parties to the Paris Agreement (i.e., national governments), PDBs have specific obligations derived directly from these Parties’ commitments to act across all policy and regulatory frameworks under their jurisdictions, including for state-owned or state-mandated institutions and agencies. Accordingly, PDBs are expected to operate in a manner that supports the achievement of the Paris goals. More specifically, they are obligated to integrate their activities within the Agreement’s implementation mechanism by providing financial, technical, and capacity building support that is entirely consistent with national low-emission climate-resilient development pathways.

  • 04/19/2024 Foreword of the week
    World bank and IMF Spring Meetings: How can the reformed institutions play a leading role in funding the transition?

    Rethinking how development can be financed to take into account the rising challenges of our time is a fastidious task, especially when thousands of experts, decision makers and practitioners want to leave their print. The outline of the new international financial architecture is being debated again this week, with more questions open for discussion than consensus on the answers. 

  • 04/19/2024 Blog post
    More and better finance: maximising positive climate impacts for a timely transition 

    Since the Paris Agreement in 2015, significant strides have been made to foster the commitment of countries and financial institutions to address the climate crisis and ensure that climate risks and opportunities are considered in investments. However, with emissions required to peak before 2025, our window of opportunity is rapidly closing to keep +1.5°C within reach. Financial needs to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to address adaptation priorities are increasing rapidly in the meantime. Luis Zamarioli Santos and Diana Cárdenas Monar, from I4CE, believe that commitment must urgently translate into action, and action must bring the urgent change the world needs. Both governments and public financial institutions have a central role to play to deliver more and better finance, maximising positive impacts. This blogpost highlights some opportunities to advance in the path for a systemic transformation, involving key stakeholders with a whole-economy approach.  

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer