Menu
FR
search
Publications Financial regulation

Is financial regulation in France in line with the Paris Agreement?

28 May 2019 - Climate Brief - By : Julie EVAIN / Michel CARDONA

The financial system has an important role to play in financing the transition of the economy and the drastic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and must take into account in its activities the risks that climate change poses to it. The French government has begun to mobilize on the subject, as have the Paris financial centre and the various institutions that supervise the financial system . What is the outcome of these actions: is financial regulation in France equal to the Paris Agreement?

In order to answer this question, the Institute for Climate Economics (I4CE) and the Frankfurt School – UNEP Centre reviewed the entire French regulatory framework applicable to the financial system in order to identify its strengths, weaknesses and therefore its necessary changes. This qualitative analysis is summarized by a rating, assigned in the most transparent way possible.

This study shows that the French regulatory framework has solid advantages, particularly compared to the European, German and Dutch frameworks analysed elsewhere. This advance is due in particular to the mandatory climate disclosures for investors, obligations that date back to the Energy Transition Law for Green Growth of 2015 and have made France a pioneering country in this field . The more recent awareness of financial supervisors in France and a strong financial market dynamic are also assets.

But on other issues the delay is significant or practices are only beginning to change. This is particularly the case for the supervision of asset managers who do not integrate climate issues or informing consumers about the climate impact of their financial investments. France is also lagging behind in taking climate change into account in national accounting standards or education and training in green and sustainable finance.

Finally, on many subjects, France has a rather wait-and-see attitude towards Europe: it prefers to wait for the introduction of new European standards. This is particularly the case for the modification of prudential regulation in order, for example, to better take into account the risks related to climate change in the calculation of the capital required from banks. This wait-and-see attitude is also reflected in the consideration of climate in investors’ fiduciary duty, or in the establishment of a taxonomy of “green” economic activities.

This evaluation exercise reveals that, although France is one of the leaders in green finance, there is still a long way to go to achieve a regulatory framework that is fully in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. The progress made in some areas should not obscure the collective work that remains to be pursued.

Plus d’informations: 

3fP, finance fit for Paris:
The results of this analysis are part of a European project 3fP “Finance fit for Paris” developed jointly by the Frankfurt School – UNEP Collaborating Centre for Climate & Sustainable Energy Finance (FS-UNEP Centre) and WWF Germany, supported by the European Climate Foundation. This project aims to analyse the compatibility between the regulatory frameworks of financial actors and the Paris Agreement. The analysis focuses on three dimensions: transparency and reporting; supervision and financial stability; and the enabling environment for the development of green finance.
For France, the evaluation is co-executed by I4CE and the FS-UNEP Centre. The 3fP-Tracker site currently includes assessments for the regulatory frameworks of the EU, France, the Netherlands and Germany. Spain and Italy will be the next countries to be analysed.
These assessments will be updated annually to take into account changes in the various regulations and practices of the financial markets.

In France, there are five financial regulatory and supervisory bodies: the Ministry of the Economy and Finance, the Banque de France, the Authority for Prudential Control and Resolution, the Financial Markets Authority and the Ministry of Ecological and Inclusive Transition for the provisions relating to Article 173-VI.

 https://www.i4ce.org/download/article-173-vi-bilan-du-reporting-climat-apres-deux-ans-dapplication/

 

Download the document:

Is financial regulation in France in line with the Paris Agreement? Download
I4CE Contacts
Julie EVAIN
Julie EVAIN
 Research Fellow – Financial regulation, Prudential transition plans Email
Michel CARDONA
Michel CARDONA
 Senior associate Expert – Financial Sector, Risks and Climate Change Email
Related projects See all projects
To learn more
  • 10/25/2024 Blog post
    Reframing the stranded assets narrative for European private financial institutions

    The implementation of the new banking package (or Capital Requirements Directive package) that adopts the final parts of the international Basel 3 financial regulation is underway in the European Union. The European Banking Authority (EBA) along with the other European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) is mandated to develop technical standards that provide the framework to help financial institutions comply with the new regulatory rules. Key among these standards is the novel guidance on ESG risks which is expected to be finalised by the EBA in the coming months. This is an opportune moment to address weaknesses in banks’ risk management practices, particularly regarding the underestimation of stranded asset risks, a missing angle in current policy debates.  

  • 07/05/2024 Foreword of the week
    After 5 years of the Green Deal, where is Europe on the road to decarbonisation?

    Following the European elections on June 9, the EU is adapting to a new, more conservative, political reality. Yet despite changing political tides, a new EU leadership will still need to find a credible answer to how the continent is to reach climate neutrality by 2050. To understand how to get there, we need a clear understanding of the progress already made. This is where the European Climate Neutrality Observatory (ECNO) comes in.

  • 06/28/2024
    From Stranded Assets to Assets-at-Risk: Reframing the narrative for European private financial institutions

    Private financial institutions must rethink their approach to managing stranded asset risks. The current narrative on quantifying fossil fuel sector exposures within a limited scope of financial portfolios (mostly loans) largely underestimates potential stranding losses. As the low-carbon transition impacts all economic sectors, private financial institutions (FIs) must consider material transition-driven stranding risks within their overall transition risk management framework using a ‘whole of economy’ lens. Traditional risk management approaches are ill-suited to the methodological and quantification challenges of transition-driven stranding risks, so a flexible, dynamic, forward-looking approach is necessary. Strong, incentivising public policy coordinated with financial regulatory and supervisory impetus is necessary to preemptively identify, monitor and manage stranding losses on ‘assets-at-risk’ (i.e., potential stranded assets). The ECB finds that 40% of the total loan portfolio of euro area banks is exposed to energy-intensive sectors*, making them vulnerable to transition risks, including stranding. It is time for an urgent reframing of the stranded asset narrative to avoid significant financial losses (endangering financial stability) and direct orderly transition finance flows to retire or transform assets-at-risk before they become fully stranded.

See all publications
Press contact Amélie FRITZ Head of Communication and press relations Email
Subscribe to our mailing list :
I register !
Subscribe to our newsletter
Once a week, receive all the information on climate economics
I register !
Fermer